Biblioteca della Libertà

Categoria/Category: Anno LI, n. 216, maggio-agosto 2016
Editore/Publisher: Centro Einaudi
Luogo/City: Torino
Anno/Year: 2016
Articolo completo/Full text: BDL_216_Piras.pdf


The dilemma of liberal democracies in the domain of ethical and religious pluralism can be stated as follows: is it possible to define the principles grounding liberal democracy so that they can justify legitimacy and political obligation, without being dependent on particular moral contents?
Habermas’s proposal of Principle D is the most ambitious and promising solution to this dilemma of pluralism. It relies strongly on the non-moral character of principle D. But can this point be maintained without contradiction? The article tries to develop the thesis that it is impossible to conceive D as practical, normative and non-moral, as Habermas argues, because: (1) this interpretation generates contradictions within the theory itself; (2) D contains implicitly a reference to the moral point of view, otherwise it couldn’t assure an equal consideration of participants; (3) it is probably impossible, in general, to treat persons as equal without treating them as moral persons.

Prossimi eventi

Diventa nostro amico su Facebook

Ricerche e Progetti

logo RGR medio

  • Recuperare la rotta é il titolo del XVIII Rapporto «Giorgio Rota» su Torino, presentato il 7 ottobre alla Biblioteca Nazionale.

lpf logo

  • WP 5/2018 Sud e lotta alla povertà: le esperienze di reddito minimo in Campania e Basilicata

  • Il progetto

rescue logo

logo euvision

Biblioteca F. Guerrini

biblioteca guerrini

 Dotata di oltre 9.000 volumi, offre una documentazione unica in Italia sul pensiero liberale contemporaneo.